As a veteran journalist who started my career when Richard Nixon was president, I can tell you that there has always been an uneasy relationship between the news media and the people they cover. Over the years, many tried to get me fired when they didn’t like stories that I wrote. I once was physically ejected from a Fresno Teachers Association meeting that would decide whether teachers would go on strike in Fresno. One political consultant, angry at a column I wrote about his candidate, threatened to beat me up when he saw me at the gym.
But I never truly thought I would be harmed. I can’t say that today when it comes to my journalism colleagues. I retired from the daily news business three years ago, and I have not been subject to the kind of threats I see being made against journalists today. President Trump’s “enemies of the people” slogan has given some the permission to threaten violence against journalists. Some have acted on the threats.
On social media recently, a Trump supporter called reporters “soft targets” and said they are “fair game in the coming revolution! Don’t be afraid to take reporters down by any means necessary!” Let that threat settle in, and ask yourself if your silence has encouraged such talk. “Oh, they don’t really mean it.” Don’t kid yourself. They really do.
In the insurrection in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, “Murder the Media” was carved into a Capitol door. News reports also told us that at least nine journalists were physically assaulted, several had their equipment damaged by the angry mob and one even tied a camera cord into a noose. (The noose and gallows, long racist symbols of hate, have become part of the white power movement, and they don’t even attempt to disguise it on their Facebook pages).
The D.C. attacks on journalists were not an aberration. Reporters around the country have been pepper-sprayed, beaten and even told directly that they will be shot. This has been going on for way too long, and yet too many stay silent.
And in Fresno, conservative talk show host Ray Appleton suggested on KMJ radio this week that some journalists should be “hanged.” He was suspended by Cumulus Media, KMJ’s parent company. Appleton said he was joking. He later acknowledged in a written apology that his words were “reckless” and he does not condone violence.
I was asked by local media outlets prior to Appleton’s suspension to react to the comment. Here is my statement in full:
“In the current environment, it is very dangerous to suggest that members of the media should be “hanged” for reporting news that you don’t like. I have no problem with people criticizing the media, but don’t suggest violence even if you are joking to make a point. If this were done tongue in cheek, as Ray says in his Facebook post, I’m glad that he has cleared this up. That was the right thing to do, and I urge him to also explain it to his listeners on his next show. But even a tongue-in-cheek comment can be dangerous because some people these days take their cues from leaders in our community.”
“In 2020, there were 328 journalists assaulted, according to the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker, and 76 journalists had their equipment damaged. In D.C. on Wednesday, we saw the mob damaging the equipment of journalists because the “enemies of the people” mantra has somehow given them permission to attack journalists. “Murder the media” was scratched into a door of the Capitol.”
“I believe strongly in the First Amendment, but I also believe that we must be responsible in the language we use against people we disagree with. Criticize their positions passionately, but let’s not ever suggest that violence should be used against anyone.”
I posted this statement on my Facebook page, and I immediately got pushback from Fresno-area Trump supporters. I said violence is not the answer. They said I was an “idiot,” and much worse. I am sad that the tone of our political debate has brought us to this point. But I am angry that my journalism colleagues face a daily onslaught from people who are so casual about threatening the use of violence to silence them.
Jim: You are so right. Over my nearly 40 years in journalism — radio, TV, print and news service in Fresno, Los Angeles and Denver — I cannot remember widespread contempt for me or my colleagues, nor any coordinated effort to harm journalists just because of what they reported. This is very different and very tragic and, to the extent it discourages news coverage and a free press, unconstitutional, even if called Free Speech. Sadly, going back to the 2016 presidential campaign, news media came under direct attack from the candidate who continued his anti-journalism attacks as president, giving a kind of permission to demonize and harm journalists whose truths you don’t like. Whole TV networks and online media have sprung up echoing that venom. and anyone with a phone and internet access can say they’re a journalist, even though they have no training, no ethical grounding and no intent to fairly report. Sadly, the issue is made worse by media itself, whose economic contraction in the face of internet growth has seriously hampered responsible journalism, leading media to enlist so-called “citizen journalists” to provide material for news reports that often is of questionable veracity. I hope the Institute for Media and Public Trust at Fresno State will help us all think about what journalism has meant to our nation and how important it will be in healing our divisions by reporting truth to us and to power.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hey Jim, thanks for the important message here. If there is one thing the past year (and week) has shown us, it is the critical importance of an independent free press and the work that journalists do.
Take care, its a little wild out there. John
LikeLike